Pollinating Bee (Photo by © P.Winberg)
Many people may be unaware that about 30% of all food crops grown in the U.S. are dependent on bee pollination and for a couple of years there have been alarming reports on the strange disappearance of huge numbers of bees.
The implications for American agriculture and the diets of American families are frightening enough, but making matters worse is the fact that no one has been able to pinpoint the cause or causes of the fate of the bees. Now the Washington Post has reported on a study conducted at the University of Virginia suggesting that “emissions from power plants and automobiles may play a part” in the demise of honeybees and bumblebees.
The research was undertaken by Environmental Sciences Professor Jose D. Fuentes at the University of Virginia -- working with graduate students Quinn S. McFrederick and James C. Kathilankal. The results of their work were published in the March issue of the journal Atmospheric Environment.
According to the article in the Post:
In the prevailing conditions before the 1800s, the researchers calculated that a flower's scent could travel between 3,280 feet and 4,000 feet, Fuentes said in an interview, but today, that scent might travel 650 feet to 1,000 feet in highly polluted areas such as the District of Columbia, Los Angeles or Houston.
Timothy H. Tear, a senior scientist at the advocacy group the Nature Conservancy, who studies the impact of air pollution on ecosystems, is quoted as saying, "We know that ozone levels continue to be high and go well beyond EPA standards for public health. What's been pretty consistent is the more we look at air pollution's impacts on natural resources, the more we find those impacts to be."
If you’d like to read the article in the Washington Post cited above go to: Air Pollution Impedes Bees' Ability to Find Flowers
Soya Field (© Fernandomoz | Dreamstime.com)
Contrary to repeated claims that turning to genetically modified crops will be necessary to solve the world’s growing food crisis, a major study conducted at the University of Kansas has found that the controversial technology actually reduces crop yields.
Though the study has received little attention in the U.S. media, The Independent of London reports that University's researchers found that genetically modified soya produces about 10% less food than its conventional equivalent.
According to The Independent:
Professor Barney Gordon, of the University's Department of Agronomy, said he started the research – reported in the journal Better Crops – because many farmers who had changed over to the GM crop had "noticed that yields are not as high as expected even under optimal conditions". He added: "People were asking the question 'how come I don't get as high a yield as I used to?'"
The results of the University of Kansas study supports previous findings. Earlier research at the University of Nebraska found that a GM soya produced 6% less than its closest conventional relative, and 11% less than the best non-GM soya available. The total U.S. cotton crop declined even as GM technology took over.
When asked if GM could solve world hunger, Professor Bob Watson, the Director of the University of Kansas study said: "The simple answer is no."
If you’d like to read the article in The Independent cited above go to: Exposed: the great GM crops myth
Organic Lemon Crop (© photo by Lisa Solonynko, courtesy of morguefile.com)
By our count there have now been at least 6 studies establishing a link between pesticides and Parkinson disease. We just read about the latest study from an article published by BBC News. Scientists from Duke University, Miami University and the Udall Parkinson's Disease Research Center of Excellence “found those exposed to pesticides had a 1.6 times higher risk” of suffering from the debilitating disease.
Providing American families with the option of enjoying food raised without pesticides has been one the great achievements of the organic farmers movement. The great demand for organic foods by consumers is a wonderfully promising trend for the American food system. Along with quests for more flavor and better nutritional value, the desire to avoid pesticides has been a key driver of the demand for organics.
Still, there’s a long way to go to overcome decades of unhealthy practices driven by the industrial food system. We can all play a part in creating a healthier and more sustainable food system by demanding that our food be raised without toxic pesticides. Our bodies, our planet, and our children will be the beneficiaries.
If you’d like to read the BBC News article cited above go to: Pesticide Parkinson's link strong
Alamo Square, San Francisco (photo by Kevin Connors, courtesy of morguefile.com)
The Mayor of San Francisco is asking the city’s restaurants to stop serving bottled water and serve tap water instead. Once a restaurateur himself, Mayor Gavin Newsom is only requesting that restaurants make the change, rather then proposing legislation to ban bottled water.
An article in the San Francisco Chronicle points out that, “The mayor made international headlines last year when he banned city government from spending tax dollars on bottled water for its employees, saying the containers clog landfills and pollute the environment.”
Recent testing by the American Waterworks Association Research Foundation found San Francisco’s watersupply to be one of the few tested that were free of contaminants. Blind taste tests revealed that San Francisco’s tap water was preferred over some bottled waters.
Food and Water Watch, a consumer advocacy group, is leading a national campaign to get restaurants to stop selling bottled water. The group’s executive director says that bottled water is a “con job and a scam.” He says customers who decline bottled water and request tap water can feel virtuous, not cheap.
If you’d like to read the San Francisco Chronicle article cited above go to: Restaurants urged to eschew bottles in favor of tap water
To view previous posts on the topic go to:
1. A Victory for Tap Water!
2. Tap Water as the Sustainable Choice
Sarah Alexander of Food & Water Watch, a nonprofit organization, has sent us the following message:
The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a rule that would let factory farms get out of reporting their releases of ammonia, hydrogen sulfide, and other toxic air pollutants caused by the breakdown of animal manure in massive lagoons. We have a right to know what toxic chemicals we're being exposed to.
In her message Sarah included this quote from a recent article in the Washington Post:
Under pressure from agriculture industry lobbyists and lawmakers from agricultural states, the Environmental Protection Agency wants to drop requirements that factory farms report their emissions of toxic gases, despite findings by the agency's scientists that the gases pose a health threat.
She also included the following to illustrate the folly of the EPA’s proposal:
One giant dairy in Oregon, home to more than 50,000 cows, reported that it releases more than 15,000 pounds of toxic ammonia into the air every day. Often these reports offer the only information neighbors of these facilities get about what they are being exposed to.
Food & Water Watch is urging concerned citizens to tell the EPA that factory farms shouldn't be above the law. If you’d like to make your voice heard at the EPA go to: Food & Water Watch: Take Action
If you’d like to read the Washington Post article cited above go to: Farms May Be Exempted From Emission Rules
Healthy Roaming Cows (photo by Alex, courtesy of morguefile.com)
The president of the meat packing company responsible for the largest recall in U.S. history admitted before Congress that sick cows were slaughtered and entered the meat supply as hamburger. The hamburger meat subsequently made its way to the tables of American families and the meals of schoolchildren.
Steve Mendell, CEO of California’s Westland/Hallmark Meat Company, first denied that sick cows were slaughtered at his company’s facility. Then he was shown a video of a "downer" cow being “shocked and abused by workers trying to move it to the ‘kill box,’ then finally shot with a bolt gun and dragged by a chain to the processing area,” according to an article in the New York Times.
A downer cow is one that is unable to stand. It is forbidden to process such cows for food unless a government veterinarian determines that the animal is fit for human consumption. This is due to the risk that they might be infected with the brain sickness commonly referred to as mad cow disease. No such determination was made by a veterinarian at the Westland/Hallmark facility.
To view the New York Times article cited above go to: Meat Packer Admits Slaughter of Sick Cows
To view a previous post on the topic go to: Best to Stick to Organic Beef
If you’d like to purchase the safest & finest Red Angus Organic Beef we’ve been able to find click on any of the following:
Organic Red Angus New York Strip Steaks
Organic Red Angus Rib Eye Steaks
Organic Red Angus Tenderloin Steaks
Harbor in Wales (photo by King of Coleslaw, courtesy of morguefile.com)
The Sustainable Development Commission has found that too many supermarket practices are “unhealthy, unjust and unsustainable” according to an article published by icWales. The Commission is the independent watchdog on sustainable development for the Government of the United Kingdom.
The article says the Commission has declared that the Welsh Assembly Government “must harness the supermarkets’ power if it is to tackle obesity, climate change and the nation’s growing rubbish mountain.”
Professor Tim Lang of the Sustainable Development Commission is quoted as saying, "Today in the era of climate change, oil dependency, looming global water shortage, fish-stock crises, biodiversity and public health challenges, to aim purely for quantity of supply or cheapness at all costs is hopelessly inadequate."
The icWales article says the Commission “calls on the Government to develop an enforceable definition of 'local' food, to promote fair trade standard systems and to work with industry to develop a system of universal sustainability standards.”
If you’d like to read the icWales article cited above go to: Supermarkets must tackle obesity and waste - report
Solar Panels (© Maxfx | Dreamstime.com)
The U.S. House of Representatives has approved legislation that would eliminate two tax breaks for the oil and gas industry that would amount to $18 billion over the next ten years. Under the legislation the money collected would provide tax breaks for wind power, solar power, other alternative energy sources, and energy conservation.
According to an Associated Press article posted by the Kansas City Star, the oil industry has lobbied strongly against the bill. The bill will face stiff opposition from Republican Senators and President Bush is expected to veto the bill if it is passed by the U.S. Senate.
The AP reports that during debate, Representative Jim McDermott of Washington urged lawmakers to "stop the madness of subsidizing oil companies" when just the five largest oil companies earned net profits of more than $120 billion last year.
Republicans said the measure unfairly punishes the oil and gas industry and pointed to statistics indicating that oil companies pay more taxes than many other industries.
If you’d like to read the Associated Press article cited above go to: House OKs new taxes on big oil companies
Free Roaming Red Angus (© Photographer: Caroline Klapper | Agency: Dreamstime.com)
If you needed another reason to only eat organically raised beef, a California meat company has issued the largest beef recall in history, 143 million pounds. Much of the suspect meat has already made its way into school lunch programs and been consumed by children.
Reports indicate that cows at the Westland/Hallmark Meat Company were so sick they could not walk, which can be an indicator of mad cow disease. The Humane Society of the United States has distributed undercover footage of workers at the factory farm kicking sick cows and using forklifts to force them to walk. Federal law bans cows that can’t walk from the food supply.
Government officials have said this is an isolated incident and mad cow disease is extremely rare, but there were 21 recalls of beef related to potentially deadly E. coli last year, compared with 8 in 2006 and 5 in 2005. The recall on Sunday by Westland/Hallmark was more than four times bigger than the previous record.
Wayne Pacelle, President and CEO of The Humane Society of the United States, has stated:
Long term, however, the federal government must step up and meet its responsibility for assuring both the integrity of food and the humane treatment of animals at all slaughter plants. A recall of this staggering scale proves that it's past time for Congress and the USDA to strengthen our laws for the sake of people and animals.
To read an article from Bloomberg.com on the recall go to: Westland/Hallmark Recalls Record Amount of U.S. Beef (Update4)
If you’d like to purchase the safest & finest Red Angus Organic Beef we’ve been able to find click on any of the following:
Organic Red Angus New York Strip Steaks
Organic Red Angus Rib Eye Steaks
Organic Red Angus Tenderloin Steaks
To view previous posts on the topic go to:
1. USDA Bans Cloned Animals from Organic Livestock
2. Paying More to Eat Well & Stay Safe
3. Organic Dairy & Meat Improves Mothers' Breast Milk
4. Damar Farms: Raising Red Angus Organically
New Hampshire Corn Harvest (photo by Paul Anderson, courtesy of morguefile.com)
Diverting corn and other grains from the food supply to the production of biofuels has received some of the blame for rising food prices. Is there an environmental benefit to biofuels that justifies a price increase that hits hardest at those who can least afford it? Two new studies indicate that the answer is no.
According to an article in the Washington Post:
One study -- written by a group of researchers from Princeton University, Woods Hole Research Center and Iowa State University along with an agriculture consultant -- concluded that over 30 years, use of traditional corn-based ethanol would produce twice as much greenhouse gas emissions as regular gasoline. Another analysis, written by a Nature Conservancy scientist along with University of Minnesota researchers, found that converting rainforests, peatlands, savannas or grasslands in Southeast Asia and Latin America to produce biofuels will increase global warming pollution for decades, if not centuries.
A number of senior scientists who work on climate change have written to President Bush and congressional leaders urging them to change their energy policies in light of the new studies.
If you'd like to read the Washington Post article cited above go to: Studies Say Clearing Land for Biofuels Will Aid Warming
Dairy Cows in Vermont (photo by Tara, courtesy of morguefile.com)
The scoially conscious Ben & Jerry's Homemade, Inc. first labeled its ice cream as free of recombinant bovine gowth hormone (rBGH) more than a decade ago. The Monsanto Co., which markets rBGH, is sponsoring efforts to ban hormone-free labeling in several states.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the use of voluntary labels more than 12 years ago in response to consumer concerns over the use of the genetically engineered hormone. Ben & Jerry's is fighting to keep those rBGH labels on their products, asserting the right of people to know what is their food..
On the Ben & Jerry's web site the company states,
We believe rBGH, a genetically engineered hormone given to dairy cows to increase their milk production, is a step in the wrong direction toward a synthetic, chemically-intensive, factory-produced food supply. It also raises the risk of serious health problems in cows.
Approximately one of three American dairy cows are injected with rBGH, which boosts milk production by about 10%. Monsanto claims that rBGH is safe for humans and labeling products as free of the synthetic hormone falsely implies that those products are safer. The FDA has ruled that rBGH is safe, but the European Union and Japan have not approved its use, citing health concerns for animals. The nonprofit Center for Food Safety says, "...this genetically engineered growth hormone is known to cause harm to cows and may pose health risks to humans."
Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility feels the synthetic hormone was approved by the FDA without adequate testing and says there is concern that it may be linked to cancer in humans. The organization has set a goal to "discontinue the production of any dairy products in Oregon from cows treated with rBGH."
Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Indiana have backed away from prohibiting hormone-free labeling after hearing from thousands of citizens, farmers, dairy processors, consumers, and activists who want rBGH labeling. Several other states, including Ohio and Missouri, are apparently considering prohibitions of hormone-free labeling.
To watch a video of Dr. Jenny Pompilio of Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility describing the harmful effects of rBGH go to: Know Your Milk: Does it Have Artificial Hormones?
Pennsylvania Farm (photo by Michelle Kwajafa, courtesy of morguefile.com)
The reasonably well-informed have good reason to prefer organic foods. Many are willing to pay more for them to avoid the health risks of processed foods produced on factory farms, and do something positive for the health of the environment.
Pesticides have been linked to Parkinson’s by multiple studies. Besides pesticides, parents would also like to avoid feeding their children growth hormones, antibiotics, herbicides, and chemical ingredients they cannot recognize or pronounce. People who live near massive factory farms and those who have visited them are understandably upset by the environmental degradation and the treatment of livestock.
We’re convinced that a more sustainable food system would greatly improve the general health and the overall quality of life. We’re not alone. Farmers in the United States and the United Kingdom have been unable to keep up with the rapidly growing demand for organics. For many small, eco-friendly farmers the cost and process of obtaining certifications is itself an obstacle.
Consumers would like to purchase organic foods that are locally grown, but find they must often make a choice. With demand outstripping supply, organic food prices have soared. Many families must consider whether the best foods for their children’s health are within their means.
Alternatives to reliance on a food system that is not serving the best interests of the community are being pursued. Farmers markets are proliferating at an impressive rate. Community gardens are offering a wonderful alternative to a diet of highly processed and unhealthy food. Educational programs are teaching children about growing and cooking healthy foods. Every individual has an opportunity to help these positive trends to flourish with their choices and actions. It doesn’t get more hopeful than that.
If you’d like to read an Associated Press article on the topic go to: Organic Food Industry in a Supply Crunch
To read an article in Food Production Daily on the topic go to: UK organic market stifled by supply problems
Electric Truck Via Solar Panels (photo by Daniel T. Yara, courtesy of morguefile.com)
For those concerned about a weakening job market there’s some positive news. It isn’t good news just for jobseekers, environmentalists will be glad to hear that the solar power industry is creating jobs, and attracting “billions of dollars in investment and mountains of enthusiasm,” according to an article in the New York Times.
Long known as a state of innovation, California is leading the way. Here is some of what the Times article has to say,
In recent months, the industry has added several thousand jobs in the production of solar energy cells and installation of solar panels on roofs. A spate of investment has also aimed at making solar power more efficient and less costly than natural gas and coal.
Bravo!
One company executive in California is quoted in the article as saying, “It is hard to find installers…We’re at the stage where if we continue to grow at this pace, we won’t be able to sustain the growth.”
Innovative technologies, private sector investors, government incentives, environmental concerns, and the nationwide interest in alternative energy sources are all playing roles in the emergence of the solar industry.
Three quarters of the demand for solar power is currently in California and solar power accounts for only a tiny fraction of the world’s $3 trillion energy market. Still, it's good to hear that a lot of smart people are working hard to change those numbers and make the world we live in a cleaner place for generations to come.
If you’d like to read the New York Times article cited above go to: A Green Energy Industry Takes Root in California
To view previous posts on the topic go to:
1. Going Solar & Getting Credit
2. Inspiring Sustainable Living
Stir-Fried Vegetables (photo by Anita Patterson Peppers, courtesy of morguefile.com)
Here's a trend we'd like to see make its way across the pond to America: England is making cooking classes mandatory for secondary school children as part of a strategy to combat obesiity and improve people's health . Apparently, some children cannot identify common vegetables.
Under the new Englsh program students will cook for one hour per week for one term. Students without sufficient financial means will have their ingredients subsidized. A report from BBC News quotes Schools Secretary Ed Balls as saying, "I think it is important to act now and maybe we should have acted earlier."
Secretary Balls went on to say, "It's not going to be just the technology of food, it will be how you can use simple ingredients, simple recipes, so that children and young people can be prepared for adult life."
Despite some fine native chefs, English cooking has been the target of many a bon mot over the years. But whatever your opnion of British cuisine, you've got to applaud what they've cooked up this time.
If you’d like to read the BBC News article cited above go to: Cookery classes to be compulsory in England
The English government is inviting people to send suggested recipes to: getcooking.consultation@dcsf.gsi.gov.uk
To view earlier posts on the topic go to:
1. Young Chefs' Academy
2. Getting Their Hands Dirty at School
3. Getting Kids to Enjoy Eating Fruits & Veggies
Free Roaming Sheep (photo by Bianca Meyer, courtesy of morguefile.com)
It seems U.S. government agencies have unsettled differences when it comes to the safety of cloned animlas in the American food supply. Even though the USDA strictly bans the use of cloned animals and their offspring from the production of organic food, the FDA insists, "...meat and milk from cattle, swine and goat clones are as safe as food we eat every day."
In light of the numerous health warnings and recalls of foods sold to American consumers, we don't find the assurances of the FDA to be at all reassuring.
The Center for Food Safety, a non-profit public interest organization, has stated, “Given the lack of data regarding human health impacts, CFS believes the FDA was premature in pronouncing food from cloned animals to be safe to eat."
An article in the Washington Post by Rick Weiss offers the following troublesome news:
Executives from the nation's major cattle cloning companies conceded yesterday that they have not been able to keep track of how many offspring of clones have entered the food supply, despite a years-old request by the FDA to keep them off the market pending completion of the agency's safety report.
At least one Kansas cattle producer also disclosed yesterday that he has openly sold semen from prize-winning clones to many U.S. meat producers in the past few years, and that he is certain he is not alone.
According to the Cornucopia Institute, a nonprofit farm policy research group, the realities of cloning include some disturbing phenomena:
• 64% of cattle, 40% of sheep, and 93% of cloned mice exhibit some form of abnormality, with a large percentage of the animals dying during gestation or shortly after birth
• High rates of late abortion and early prenatal death, with failure rates of 95% to 97% in most mammal cloning attempts
• Defects such as grossly oversized calves, enlarged tongues, squashed faces, intestinal blockages, immune deficiencies, and diabetes
• When cloning does not produce a normal animal, many of the difficult pregnancies cause physical suffering or death to the surrogate mothers
Mark Kastel of the Cornucopia Institute says:
Regardless of what the proponents claim this is all about bottom-line profit and producing more and more of our food from giant industrial-scale farming operations. We are getting so, so far away from farmer Jones and the intimate connection between the land, animals, and the people who care for them in a sustainable and regenerative system. I wish I could say this was science fiction.
If you'd like to read the Washington Post article cited above go to: USDA Recommends That Food From Clones Stay Off the Market
To learn more about this & other food safety issues click on the following organizations:
The Cornucopia Institute
Center for Food Safety
Organic Consumers Association
Consumers Union
USDA’s National Organic Program
U.S. Currency (photo by Dawn M. Turner, courtesy of morguefile.com)
Most American families are probably well aware that food prices have been rising. A report in The Toledo Blade confirms what they’ve been experiencing on the checkout line: food prices increased by 5.4% between November 2006 and November 2007, according to the Consumer Price Index.
Some staples of the American diet have seen very steep increases since 2000, according to the article. The price of a dozen eggs has gone from 97 cents in 2000, to $2.49. The cost of a gallon of milk has risen from $2.78 in January of 2000 to about $3.95 today, and the price of a fresh whole chicken has climbed from $1.05 to $1.49 a pound during that time. A rise in the cost of imported produce is largely attributed to the decline in the value of the dollar. Produce rose 1.7% in just one month, the largest increase in 14 years.
The Toledo Blade article quotes J. DiNuzzo, president of DiNuzzo Investment Advisors Inc., as saying, "The weaker currency is having an effect all across the board, all the way to food prices."
Sharply rising demand for biofuels and record-setting oil prices are also blamed as culprits making food more expensive. In Mexico, citizens have taken to the streets in protest of rising corn prices as that diet staple has been diverted from food to biofuel production.
The article indicates that food prices will continue to rise as the dollar grows weaker.
If you’d like to read The Toledo Blade article cited above go to: Food prices increase by 5.4%
Our friends at American Farmland Trust have sent us some wonderful news about the preservation of family-scale farming in New York State:
Nearly 13,300 acres of active farmland across New York will be protected—on 35 farms in 22 counties—thanks to $35 million in funding from the state’s Farmland Protection Program. The funding is the largest amount ever dedicated to farmland protection in the state, and will go to protect the largest single amount of acreage in the program’s 11-year history.
"This announcement marks a great victory for farmland conservation in New York," said David Haight, AFT’s New York Director. "AFT applauds the governor and New York legislature for their commitment to this critical program."
If you’d like to learn more about the efforts of AFT go to: American Farmland Trust: Saving the Land that Sustains Us
Here’s some great news we received from our friends at American Farmland Trust:
After several days of intense debate, the Senate passed a farm bill by a vote of 79-14.
In a victory for subsidy reform, the optional Average Crop Revenue (ACR) program passed. By adjusting with market prices, ACR is less production and trade distorting and represents a good step toward changing the way subsidies operate now and in the future. Your support helped this program get into the Senate package.
The Senate bill increases funding for conservation programs including wetland and grassland protection, stewardship of working lands and water quality in the Chesapeake Bay. It also expands funding for nutrition, healthy diets programs for school children, and a number of local programs supporting farmers’ markets and expanded access for low income individuals. Other areas receiving additional funding include programs to save energy and help farmers and ranchers supply renewable energy to the nation, and programs to strengthen organic producers.
There is still work to be done. We were very disappointed that Senators did not find the political will to support amendments that more significantly reform commodity subsidies, or adequately fund programs to protect farm and ranch land (FRPP) and water quality (EQIP).
Now we shift our focus to the Conference Committee where the House and Senate bills must be reconciled. There are key differences between the two bills and we’re working to take the best from both for a bill that includes reform and keeps the increased funding for our key priorities—farmland protection and conservation, healthy, local foods, environmentally responsible renewable energy production and nutrition programs. We have a lot of work to do, but with your help it is possible.
If you’d like to learn more about the efforts of AFT go to: American Farmland Trust: Saving the Land that Sustains Us
Real Free-Roaming Cows (photo by Emily Roesly, courtesy of morguefile.com)
In a scandal now ensnaring some of the nations leading retailers, a series of lawsuits have been filed accusing Wal-Mart, Costco, Target, Safeway, and Wild Oats of consumer fraud for marketing suspect organic milk.
The legal filings in federal courts come on the heels of class action lawsuits against Aurora Dairy Corporation, based in Boulder, Colorado. The suits against Aurora and the grocery chains allege consumer fraud, negligence, and unjust enrichment concerning the sale of organic milk. This past April, Aurora officials received a notice from the USDA detailing multiple and “willful” violations of federal organic law that were found by federal investigators.
“This is the largest scandal in the history of the organic industry,” said Mark Kastel of The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based farm policy research group. Cornucopia’s investigation in 2005, first alerted USDA investigators to the improprieties occurring at Aurora. “Aurora was taking advantage of the consumer’s good will in the marketplace toward organics, and the USDA has allowed this scofflaw-corporation to continue to operate,” Kastel added.
Aurora, with $100 million in annual sales, provides milk that is sold as organic and packaged as private label, store-brand products for many of the nation’s biggest chains. In addition to Wal-Mart, Target, Costco, Safeway, and Wild Oats, Aurora serves as supplier to 15 other national and regional chains.
The stores sell Aurora's milk under their own in-house brand names, such as Costco's Kirkland and Target's Archer Farms, in cartons marked "USDA organic," typically with pictures of pastures or other bucolic scenes.
"That's not even close to the reality of where this milk was coming from," said Steve Berman, a Seattle lawyer whose firm is among those suing. "These cows are all penned in factory-confinement conditions."
Independent investigators at the USDA concluded earlier this year that Aurora—with five dairy facilities in Colorado and Texas, each milking thousands of cows—had 14 “willful” violations of federal organic regulations.
Cornucopia points out that Aurora is a "horrible aberration," and that the vast majority of all organic dairy products are produced with high integrity. In a scorecard published last year, and available on their web site, Cornucopia rates over 90% of organic name-brand dairy products as truly subscribing to the letter and spirit of the law.
"We have learned that Wild Oats and the Publix supermarket chain in Florida are no longer buying milk from Aurora,” stated Kastel. "In addition, the nation's largest distributor of natural and organic products, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI) has also secured an alternative source for their Woodstock Farms brand."
“Aurora’s actions have injured the reputation of the more than 1500 legitimate organic dairy farmers who are faithfully following federal organic rules and regulations,” noted Kastel. “We cannot allow these families to be placed at a competitive disadvantage.”
Mark Pepperzak, Aurora CEO, said, "The allegations in this smear campaign against AOD are based on false information and, therefore, completely unfounded."
"It is unconscionable that the USDA allowed Aurora to continue, after making millions of dollars, in this ‘ethics-based’ industry, when they had concluded that Aurora willfully violated the law," Kastel added. "However, there is a higher authority in terms of organic integrity than the USDA—that's the organic consumer. And they are about to make their voices heard through the courts."
If you'd like to learn more about the excellent work of the Institute & how you might help go to: Cornucopia Institute
 
(Images courtesy of American Farmland Trust)
We join our friends at the American Farmland Trust in urging everyone to make their voices heard on the 2007 Farm Bill. Farm bill progress in the Senate is completely stalled. It's imperative a farm bill is passed this year. America's farmers and ranchers deserve a better farm bill, and the progress they've made should not be erased.
The Senate Agriculture Committee needs to hear from you.
Please call both your Senators as soon as you can and tell them to support Dorgan-Grassley. The Dorgan-Grassley amendment will provide more equitable farm aid to small- and medium-scale family farmers. In addition, money saved can be used for important programs to conserve healthy soil and fresh water, fund beginning farmer programs, and undertake organic research.
You can get more information and find your Senators' phone numbers at: American Farmland Trust
Thanks for supporting family farmers and doing your part to create a sustainable future!
Salt Shaker (photo by Michael Connors, courtesy of morguefile.com)
In an effort to save lives and reduce disability from stroke and heart disease, 17 of Canada’s leading health groups and professional associations have urged comprehensive action to reduce sodium levels in food.
“Increased blood pressure is the leading risk factor for death, causing most of the strokes and much of the heart disease our country faces,” says Dr. Norm Campbell of Blood Pressure Canada. “It is estimated that almost one in three Canadians who have hypertension would have normal blood pressure if there was less sodium in our food.”
To read the full press release on which this item was based go to: Reductions needed in the sodium added to foods
To view previous posts on this topc go to:
1. Cutting the Salt in Food Doesn't Increase Spoilage
2. Too Much Salt!
The Last Sod School House in Kansas (photo courtesy of Library of Congress, circa 1908)
School nutrition programs are making real progress in introducing healthier food items in school meals, according to the results of the 2006 School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS). The findings included in the study are consistent with trends seen in the 2007 School Nutrition Operations Report and the 2007 SNA School Trends Report.
The School Nutrition Association (SNA) is encouraged by the overall findings from SHPPS 2006. The Report echoes what school nutrition professionals see everyday in the school dining room - that school nutrition programs are offering more fruits and vegetables, more whole grains and more low fat dairy than ever before, and less high fat foods.
Some of the highlights from the survey include:
• 18.8% of schools offer deep-fried potatoes, down dramatically from 40.0% in 2000.
• Among the 62.4% of schools in which staff at the school level had responsibility for deciding what food to order, in a typical week, over 55% was 1% or skim milk and only 9.3% was whole milk.
• Among the 96.8% of elementary schools that provided recess, recess was regularly scheduled immediately before lunch for all classes in 10.4% of these schools, and immediately after lunch in 49.6%.
• School districts required 87.9% of high schools, 85.1% of middle schools and 77.4% of elementary schools to teach nutrition education.
If you'd like to read the full SNA press release on which the above was based go to: CDC Releases 2006 SHPPS Report
Pitcher of Milk (photo by Lisa Rowell, courtesy of morgurfile.com)
“This is the largest scandal in the history of the organic industry,” said Mark Kastel of The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based farm policy research group.
Acting on behalf of organic food consumers in 27 states, class action lawsuits are being filed in U.S. federal courts, in St. Louis and Denver, against the nation’s largest organic dairy. The suits charge Aurora Dairy Corporation, based in Boulder, Colorado, with allegations of consumer fraud, negligence, and unjust enrichment concerning the sale of organic milk by the company. This past April, Aurora officials received a notice from the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) detailing multiple and “willful” violations of federal organic law that were found by federal investigators.
Cornucopia’s 2005 formal legal complaint first alerted USDA investigators to the improprieties occurring at Aurora. “Aurora was taking advantage of the consumer’s good will in the marketplace toward organics, and the USDA has allowed this scofflaw-corporation to continue to operate,” says Kastel.
Aurora, with $100 million in annual sales, provides milk that is sold as organic and packaged as private label, store-brand products for some of the nation’s biggest chains, including Wal-Mart, Target, Costco, Safeway, Wild Oats, and about 20 others.
Independent investigators at the USDA concluded earlier this year that Aurora—with five dairy facilities in Colorado and Texas, each milking thousands of cows—had 14 “willful” violations of federal organic regulations. One of the most egregious of the findings was that from December 5, 2003, to April 16, 2007, the Aurora Dairy “labeled and represented milk as organically produced, when such milk was not produced
“We believe that there are tens of thousands of consumers across the United States who have been directly impacted by Aurora’s practices,” said Ronnie Cummins of the Organic Consumers Association. “We are pleased to see this legal action. We will do what we can to ensure that organic continues to mean organic and that consumers get exactly that when they are paying premium prices for organic food,” Cummins added.
To learn more a |
